0.00/0.03	% Problem  : theBenchmark.p : TPTP v0.0.0. Released v0.0.0.
0.00/0.05	% Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 180 THM
0.10/0.41	% Computer : n013.cluster.edu
0.10/0.41	% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
0.10/0.41	% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
0.10/0.41	% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
0.10/0.41	% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
0.10/0.41	% CPULimit : 1440
0.10/0.42	% WCLimit  : 180
0.10/0.42	% DateTime : Mon Jul 27 09:10:55 UTC 2026
0.10/0.42	% CPUTime  : 
0.10/0.42	Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 180 THM
0.17/0.46	Running higher-order theorem proving
0.17/0.47	Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover-ho --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=180 /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.al7Zg78rCG/E---3.1_1258894.p
0.17/0.49	% Version: 3.5.1-ho
0.17/0.49	% Preprocessing class: HSSSSMSSSSSNHHA.
0.17/0.49	% Scheduled 5 strats onto 8 cores with 180 seconds (1440 total)
0.17/0.49	% Starting sh2lt with 720s (4) cores
0.17/0.49	% Starting new_ho_10_unif with 180s (1) cores
0.17/0.49	% Starting full_lambda_6 with 180s (1) cores
0.17/0.49	% Starting post_as_ho1 with 180s (1) cores
0.17/0.49	% Starting ehoh_best3_rw with 180s (1) cores
0.17/0.49	% sh2lt with pid 1258917 completed with status 0
0.17/0.49	% Result found by sh2lt
0.17/0.49	% Preprocessing class: HSSSSMSSSSSNHHA.
0.17/0.49	% Scheduled 5 strats onto 8 cores with 180 seconds (1440 total)
0.17/0.49	% Starting sh2lt with 720s (4) cores
0.17/0.49	% (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,5,,4,20000,1.0,true))
0.17/0.49	% SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,5,,4,20000,1.0,true)
0.17/0.49	% Search class: HGHNF-FFSF21-SHHFFMBN
0.17/0.49	% Scheduled 7 strats onto 4 cores with 720 seconds (720 total)
0.17/0.49	% Starting SubtermCWHack with 65s (1) cores
0.17/0.49	% Starting sh2lt with 73s (1) cores
0.17/0.49	% Starting full_lambda_9 with 98s (1) cores
0.17/0.49	% Starting ho_unfolding_2 with 98s (1) cores
0.17/0.49	% SubtermCWHack with pid 1258926 completed with status 0
0.17/0.49	% Result found by SubtermCWHack
0.17/0.49	% Preprocessing class: HSSSSMSSSSSNHHA.
0.17/0.49	% Scheduled 5 strats onto 8 cores with 180 seconds (1440 total)
0.17/0.49	% Starting sh2lt with 720s (4) cores
0.17/0.49	% (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,5,,4,20000,1.0,true))
0.17/0.49	% SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,5,,4,20000,1.0,true)
0.17/0.49	% Search class: HGHNF-FFSF21-SHHFFMBN
0.17/0.49	% Scheduled 7 strats onto 4 cores with 720 seconds (720 total)
0.17/0.49	% Starting SubtermCWHack with 65s (1) cores
0.17/0.49	% Preprocessing time       : 0.001 s
0.17/0.49	
0.17/0.49	% Proof found!
0.17/0.49	% SZS status Theorem
0.17/0.49	% SZS output start CNFRefutation
0.17/0.49	thf(decl_23, type, epred1_0: ($i > $o) > $i > $o).
0.17/0.49	thf(decl_24, type, esk1_2: ($i > $o) > ($i > $o) > $i).
0.17/0.49	thf(decl_25, type, esk2_0: $i).
0.17/0.49	thf(decl_26, type, esk3_1: ($i > $o) > $i).
0.17/0.49	thf(decl_27, type, epred2_0: $i > $o).
0.17/0.49	thf(decl_28, type, epred3_0: $i > $o).
0.17/0.49	thf(decl_29, type, epred4_1: $i > $i > $o).
0.17/0.49	thf(decl_30, type, esk4_2: $i > ($i > $o) > $i).
0.17/0.49	thf(cTHM2A_pme, conjecture, ![X1:($i > $o) > $i > $o]:((![X2:$i > $o, X3:$i > $o]:((![X4:$i]:(((X1 @ X2 @ X4)=>(X1 @ X3 @ X4)))<=![X4:$i]:(((X3 @ X4)<=(X2 @ X4)))))=>![X5:$i]:(((X1 @ (^[X4:$i]:(?[X6:$i > $o]:(((![X7:$i]:((((X1 @ X6 @ X7))<=((X6 @ X7)))))&((X6 @ X4)))))) @ X5)<=>?[X6:$i > $o]:((![X4:$i]:(((X6 @ X4)=>(X1 @ X6 @ X4)))&(X6 @ X5))))))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.al7Zg78rCG/E---3.1_1258894.p', cTHM2A_pme)).
0.17/0.49	thf(c_0_1, negated_conjecture, ~(![X1:($i > $o) > $i > $o]:((![X2:$i > $o, X3:$i > $o]:((![X4:$i]:(((X1 @ X2 @ X4)=>(X1 @ X3 @ X4)))<=![X4:$i]:(((X3 @ X4)<=(X2 @ X4)))))=>![X5:$i]:(((X1 @ (^[X4:$i]:(?[X6:$i > $o]:(((![X7:$i]:((((X1 @ X6 @ X7))<=((X6 @ X7)))))&((X6 @ X4)))))) @ X5)<=>?[X6:$i > $o]:((![X4:$i]:(((X6 @ X4)=>(X1 @ X6 @ X4)))&(X6 @ X5)))))))), inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[cTHM2A_pme])).
0.17/0.49	thf(c_0_2, negated_conjecture, ~(![X1:($i > $o) > $i > $o]:((![X2:$i > $o, X3:$i > $o]:((![X4:$i]:(((X2 @ X4)=>(X3 @ X4)))=>![X4:$i]:(((X1 @ X2 @ X4)=>(X1 @ X3 @ X4)))))=>![X5:$i]:(((X1 @ (^[Z0:$i]:(?[X6:$i > $o]:(((![X7:$i]:(((X1 @ X6 @ X7)<=(X6 @ X7))))&(X6 @ Z0))))) @ X5)<=>?[X6:$i > $o]:((![X4:$i]:(((X6 @ X4)=>(X1 @ X6 @ X4)))&(X6 @ X5)))))))), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[c_0_1])])).
0.17/0.49	thf(c_0_3, negated_conjecture, ![X17:$i > $o, X18:$i > $o, X20:$i, X22:$i > $o, X25:$i]:(((((X17 @ (esk1_2 @ X17 @ X18))|(~(epred1_0 @ X17 @ X20)|(epred1_0 @ X18 @ X20)))&(~(X18 @ (esk1_2 @ X17 @ X18))|(~(epred1_0 @ X17 @ X20)|(epred1_0 @ X18 @ X20))))&((((X22 @ (esk3_1 @ X22))|~(X22 @ esk2_0)|~(epred1_0 @ (^[Z0:$i]:(?[X6:$i > $o]:(((![X7:$i]:(((epred1_0 @ X6 @ X7)<=(X6 @ X7))))&(X6 @ Z0))))) @ esk2_0))&(~(epred1_0 @ X22 @ (esk3_1 @ X22))|~(X22 @ esk2_0)|~(epred1_0 @ (^[Z0:$i]:(?[X6:$i > $o]:(((![X7:$i]:(((epred1_0 @ X6 @ X7)<=(X6 @ X7))))&(X6 @ Z0))))) @ esk2_0)))&((~(epred2_0 @ X25)|(epred1_0 @ epred2_0 @ X25)|(epred1_0 @ (^[Z0:$i]:(?[X6:$i > $o]:(((![X7:$i]:(((epred1_0 @ X6 @ X7)<=(X6 @ X7))))&(X6 @ Z0))))) @ esk2_0))&((epred2_0 @ esk2_0)|(epred1_0 @ (^[Z0:$i]:(?[X6:$i > $o]:(((![X7:$i]:(((epred1_0 @ X6 @ X7)<=(X6 @ X7))))&(X6 @ Z0))))) @ esk2_0)))))), inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_2])])])])])])).
0.17/0.49	thf(c_0_4, plain, ![X28:$i]:(((epred3_0 @ X28)<=>?[X26:$i > $o]:((![X27:$i]:(((epred1_0 @ X26 @ X27)<=(X26 @ X27)))&(X26 @ X28))))), introduced(definition)).
0.17/0.49	thf(c_0_5, negated_conjecture, ![X2:$i > $o]:((~((epred1_0 @ X2 @ (esk3_1 @ X2)))|~((X2 @ esk2_0))|~((((epred1_0 @ epred3_0 @ esk2_0))=(($true)))))), inference(lift_lambdas,[status(thm)],[inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_3]), c_0_4])).
0.17/0.49	thf(c_0_6, plain, ![X38:$i, X40:$i, X41:$i > $o]:((((~(epred4_1 @ X38 @ X40)|(epred1_0 @ (epred4_1 @ X38) @ X40)|~(epred3_0 @ X38))&((epred4_1 @ X38 @ X38)|~(epred3_0 @ X38)))&(((X41 @ (esk4_2 @ X38 @ X41))|~(X41 @ X38)|(epred3_0 @ X38))&(~(epred1_0 @ X41 @ (esk4_2 @ X38 @ X41))|~(X41 @ X38)|(epred3_0 @ X38))))), inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[])])])])])])])).
0.17/0.49	thf(c_0_7, negated_conjecture, ![X2:$i > $o]:(((X2 @ (esk3_1 @ X2))|~((X2 @ esk2_0))|~((((epred1_0 @ epred3_0 @ esk2_0))=(($true)))))), inference(lift_lambdas,[status(thm)],[inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_3]), c_0_4])).
0.17/0.49	thf(c_0_8, negated_conjecture, ![X2:$i > $o]:((~((epred1_0 @ X2 @ (esk3_1 @ X2)))|~((epred1_0 @ epred3_0 @ esk2_0))|~((X2 @ esk2_0)))), inference(cn,[status(thm)],[c_0_5])).
0.17/0.49	thf(c_0_9, plain, ![X5:$i, X4:$i]:(((epred1_0 @ (epred4_1 @ X4) @ X5)|~((epred4_1 @ X4 @ X5))|~((epred3_0 @ X4)))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6])).
0.17/0.49	thf(c_0_10, negated_conjecture, ![X2:$i > $o]:(((X2 @ (esk3_1 @ X2))|~((epred1_0 @ epred3_0 @ esk2_0))|~((X2 @ esk2_0)))), inference(cn,[status(thm)],[c_0_7])).
0.17/0.49	thf(c_0_11, negated_conjecture, ![X4:$i]:(((epred1_0 @ epred2_0 @ X4)|(((epred1_0 @ epred3_0 @ esk2_0))=(($true)))|~((epred2_0 @ X4)))), inference(lift_lambdas,[status(thm)],[inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_3]), c_0_4])).
0.17/0.49	thf(c_0_12, plain, ![X4:$i]:((~((epred1_0 @ epred3_0 @ esk2_0))|~((epred4_1 @ X4 @ esk2_0))|~((epred3_0 @ X4)))), inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_8, c_0_9]), c_0_10])).
0.17/0.49	thf(c_0_13, plain, ![X4:$i]:(((epred4_1 @ X4 @ X4)|~((epred3_0 @ X4)))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6])).
0.17/0.49	thf(c_0_14, negated_conjecture, ((epred2_0 @ esk2_0)|(((epred1_0 @ epred3_0 @ esk2_0))=(($true)))), inference(lift_lambdas,[status(thm)],[inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_3]), c_0_4])).
0.17/0.49	thf(c_0_15, negated_conjecture, ![X2:$i > $o, X3:$i > $o, X4:$i]:(((X2 @ (esk1_2 @ X2 @ X3))|(epred1_0 @ X3 @ X4)|~((epred1_0 @ X2 @ X4)))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_3])).
0.17/0.49	thf(c_0_16, negated_conjecture, ![X4:$i]:(((epred1_0 @ epred3_0 @ esk2_0)|(epred1_0 @ epred2_0 @ X4)|~((epred2_0 @ X4)))), inference(cn,[status(thm)],[c_0_11])).
0.17/0.49	thf(c_0_17, plain, (~((epred1_0 @ epred3_0 @ esk2_0))|~((epred3_0 @ esk2_0))), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_12, c_0_13])).
0.17/0.49	thf(c_0_18, negated_conjecture, ((epred1_0 @ epred3_0 @ esk2_0)|(epred2_0 @ esk2_0)), inference(cn,[status(thm)],[c_0_14])).
0.17/0.49	thf(c_0_19, plain, ![X2:$i > $o, X4:$i]:(((epred3_0 @ X4)|~((epred1_0 @ X2 @ (esk4_2 @ X4 @ X2)))|~((X2 @ X4)))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6])).
0.17/0.49	thf(c_0_20, plain, ![X2:$i > $o, X4:$i]:(((X2 @ (esk4_2 @ X4 @ X2))|(epred3_0 @ X4)|~((X2 @ X4)))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6])).
0.17/0.49	thf(c_0_21, negated_conjecture, ![X2:$i > $o, X4:$i]:(((epred2_0 @ (esk1_2 @ epred2_0 @ X2))|(epred1_0 @ epred3_0 @ esk2_0)|(epred1_0 @ X2 @ X4)|~((epred2_0 @ X4)))), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_15, c_0_16])).
0.17/0.49	thf(c_0_22, negated_conjecture, ((epred2_0 @ esk2_0)|~((epred3_0 @ esk2_0))), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_17, c_0_18])).
0.17/0.49	thf(c_0_23, plain, ![X2:$i > $o, X5:$i, X4:$i]:(((epred4_1 @ X4 @ (esk1_2 @ (epred4_1 @ X4) @ X2))|(epred1_0 @ X2 @ X5)|~((epred4_1 @ X4 @ X5))|~((epred3_0 @ X4)))), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_15, c_0_9])).
0.17/0.49	thf(c_0_24, plain, ![X4:$i]:(((epred1_0 @ epred3_0 @ esk2_0)|(epred3_0 @ X4)|~((epred2_0 @ X4)))), inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_19, c_0_16]), c_0_20])).
0.17/0.49	thf(c_0_25, negated_conjecture, ![X2:$i > $o]:(((epred2_0 @ (esk1_2 @ epred2_0 @ X2))|(epred1_0 @ X2 @ esk2_0)|~((epred3_0 @ esk2_0)))), inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_21, c_0_22]), c_0_17])).
0.17/0.49	thf(c_0_26, plain, ![X4:$i, X5:$i]:(((epred3_0 @ X4)|~((epred4_1 @ X5 @ X4))|~((epred3_0 @ X5)))), inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_19, c_0_9]), c_0_20])).
0.17/0.49	thf(c_0_27, plain, ![X2:$i > $o, X4:$i]:(((epred4_1 @ X4 @ (esk1_2 @ (epred4_1 @ X4) @ X2))|(epred1_0 @ X2 @ X4)|~((epred3_0 @ X4)))), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_23, c_0_13])).
0.17/0.49	thf(c_0_28, negated_conjecture, ![X2:$i > $o, X3:$i > $o, X4:$i]:(((epred1_0 @ X2 @ X4)|~((X2 @ (esk1_2 @ X3 @ X2)))|~((epred1_0 @ X3 @ X4)))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_3])).
0.17/0.49	thf(c_0_29, plain, ![X2:$i > $o]:(((epred3_0 @ (esk1_2 @ epred2_0 @ X2))|(epred1_0 @ X2 @ esk2_0)|~((epred3_0 @ esk2_0)))), inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_24, c_0_25]), c_0_17])).
0.17/0.49	thf(c_0_30, plain, ![X2:$i > $o, X4:$i]:(((epred3_0 @ (esk1_2 @ (epred4_1 @ X4) @ X2))|(epred1_0 @ X2 @ X4)|~((epred3_0 @ X4)))), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_26, c_0_27])).
0.17/0.49	thf(c_0_31, negated_conjecture, ![X4:$i]:(((epred1_0 @ epred3_0 @ X4)|~((epred1_0 @ epred2_0 @ X4))|~((epred3_0 @ esk2_0)))), inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_28, c_0_29]), c_0_17])).
0.17/0.49	thf(c_0_32, negated_conjecture, ![X5:$i, X4:$i]:(((epred1_0 @ epred3_0 @ X4)|(epred1_0 @ epred3_0 @ X5)|~((epred1_0 @ (epred4_1 @ X4) @ X5))|~((epred3_0 @ X4)))), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_28, c_0_30])).
0.17/0.49	thf(c_0_33, negated_conjecture, ![X4:$i]:(((epred1_0 @ epred3_0 @ X4)|~((epred3_0 @ esk2_0))|~((epred2_0 @ X4)))), inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_31, c_0_16]), c_0_17])).
0.17/0.49	thf(c_0_34, plain, ![X4:$i, X5:$i]:(((epred1_0 @ epred3_0 @ X4)|(epred1_0 @ epred3_0 @ X5)|~((epred4_1 @ X5 @ X4))|~((epred3_0 @ X5)))), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_32, c_0_9])).
0.17/0.49	thf(c_0_35, plain, ![X2:$i > $o, X3:$i > $o, X4:$i]:(((epred1_0 @ X2 @ (esk4_2 @ X4 @ (epred1_0 @ X3)))|(X3 @ (esk1_2 @ X3 @ X2))|(epred3_0 @ X4)|~((epred1_0 @ X3 @ X4)))), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_15, c_0_20])).
0.17/0.49	thf(c_0_36, plain, ~((epred3_0 @ esk2_0)), inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_17, c_0_33]), c_0_22])).
0.17/0.49	thf(c_0_37, plain, ![X4:$i]:(((epred1_0 @ epred3_0 @ X4)|~((epred3_0 @ X4)))), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_34, c_0_13])).
0.17/0.49	thf(c_0_38, negated_conjecture, ![X2:$i > $o]:(((epred1_0 @ X2 @ (esk4_2 @ esk2_0 @ (epred1_0 @ epred3_0)))|(epred3_0 @ (esk1_2 @ epred3_0 @ X2))|(epred2_0 @ esk2_0))), inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_35, c_0_18]), c_0_36])).
0.17/0.49	thf(c_0_39, negated_conjecture, ![X2:$i > $o, X4:$i]:(((epred1_0 @ (epred1_0 @ epred3_0) @ X4)|~((epred3_0 @ (esk1_2 @ X2 @ (epred1_0 @ epred3_0))))|~((epred1_0 @ X2 @ X4)))), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_28, c_0_37])).
0.17/0.49	thf(c_0_40, plain, ((epred3_0 @ (esk1_2 @ epred3_0 @ (epred1_0 @ epred3_0)))|(epred2_0 @ esk2_0)), inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_19, c_0_38]), c_0_36]), c_0_18])).
0.17/0.49	thf(c_0_41, negated_conjecture, ![X4:$i]:(((epred1_0 @ (epred1_0 @ epred3_0) @ X4)|(epred2_0 @ esk2_0)|~((epred1_0 @ epred3_0 @ X4)))), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_39, c_0_40])).
0.17/0.49	thf(c_0_42, negated_conjecture, ((epred2_0 @ esk2_0)|~((epred1_0 @ epred3_0 @ (esk3_1 @ (epred1_0 @ epred3_0))))), inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_8, c_0_41]), c_0_18])).
0.17/0.49	thf(c_0_43, negated_conjecture, (epred2_0 @ esk2_0), inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_42, c_0_10]), c_0_18])).
0.17/0.49	thf(c_0_44, plain, (epred1_0 @ epred3_0 @ esk2_0), inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_24, c_0_43]), c_0_36])).
0.17/0.49	thf(c_0_45, plain, ![X2:$i > $o]:(((epred1_0 @ X2 @ (esk4_2 @ esk2_0 @ (epred1_0 @ epred3_0)))|(epred3_0 @ (esk1_2 @ epred3_0 @ X2)))), inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_35, c_0_44]), c_0_36])).
0.17/0.49	thf(c_0_46, plain, (epred3_0 @ (esk1_2 @ epred3_0 @ (epred1_0 @ epred3_0))), inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_19, c_0_45]), c_0_44])]), c_0_36])).
0.17/0.49	thf(c_0_47, negated_conjecture, ![X2:$i > $o]:((~((epred1_0 @ X2 @ (esk3_1 @ X2)))|~((X2 @ esk2_0)))), inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_8, c_0_44])])).
0.17/0.49	thf(c_0_48, negated_conjecture, ![X4:$i]:(((epred1_0 @ (epred1_0 @ epred3_0) @ X4)|~((epred1_0 @ epred3_0 @ X4)))), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_39, c_0_46])).
0.17/0.49	thf(c_0_49, negated_conjecture, ~((epred1_0 @ epred3_0 @ (esk3_1 @ (epred1_0 @ epred3_0)))), inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_47, c_0_48]), c_0_44])])).
0.17/0.49	thf(c_0_50, negated_conjecture, ![X2:$i > $o]:(((X2 @ (esk3_1 @ X2))|~((X2 @ esk2_0)))), inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_10, c_0_44])])).
0.17/0.49	thf(c_0_51, negated_conjecture, ($false), inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_49, c_0_50]), c_0_44])]), ['proof']).
0.17/0.49	% SZS output end CNFRefutation
0.17/0.49	% Parsed axioms                        : 1
0.17/0.49	% Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 0
0.17/0.49	% Initial clauses                      : 10
0.17/0.49	% Removed in clause preprocessing      : 0
0.17/0.49	% Initial clauses in saturation        : 10
0.17/0.49	% Processed clauses                    : 59
0.17/0.49	% ...of these trivial                  : 0
0.17/0.49	% ...subsumed                          : 7
0.17/0.49	% ...remaining for further processing  : 52
0.17/0.49	% Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 0
0.17/0.49	% Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
0.17/0.49	% Backward-subsumed                    : 10
0.17/0.49	% Backward-rewritten                   : 15
0.17/0.49	% Generated clauses                    : 120
0.17/0.49	% ...of the previous two non-redundant : 108
0.17/0.49	% ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
0.17/0.49	% Contextual simplify-reflections      : 11
0.17/0.49	% Paramodulations                      : 120
0.17/0.49	% Factorizations                       : 0
0.17/0.49	% NegExts                              : 0
0.17/0.49	% Equation resolutions                 : 0
0.17/0.49	% Disequality decompositions           : 0
0.17/0.49	% Total rewrite steps                  : 19
0.17/0.49	% ...of those cached                   : 17
0.17/0.49	% Propositional unsat checks           : 0
0.17/0.49	%    Propositional check models        : 0
0.17/0.49	%    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
0.17/0.49	%    Propositional clauses             : 0
0.17/0.49	%    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
0.17/0.49	%    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
0.17/0.49	%    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
0.17/0.49	%    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
0.17/0.49	%    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
0.17/0.49	%    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
0.17/0.49	%    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
0.17/0.49	%    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
0.17/0.49	% Current number of processed clauses  : 27
0.17/0.49	%    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 3
0.17/0.49	%    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
0.17/0.49	%    Negative unit clauses             : 2
0.17/0.49	%    Non-unit-clauses                  : 22
0.17/0.49	% Current number of unprocessed clauses: 48
0.17/0.49	% ...number of literals in the above   : 197
0.17/0.49	% Current number of archived formulas  : 0
0.17/0.49	% Current number of archived clauses   : 25
0.17/0.49	% Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 270
0.17/0.49	% Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 170
0.17/0.49	% Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 18
0.17/0.49	% Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 13
0.17/0.49	% Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
0.17/0.49	% BW rewrite match attempts            : 2
0.17/0.49	% BW rewrite match successes           : 2
0.17/0.49	% Condensation attempts                : 0
0.17/0.49	% Condensation successes               : 0
0.17/0.49	% Termbank termtop insertions          : 3756
0.17/0.49	% Search garbage collected termcells   : 547
0.17/0.49	
0.17/0.49	% -------------------------------------------------
0.17/0.49	% User time                : 0.011 s
0.17/0.49	% System time              : 0.003 s
0.17/0.49	% Total time               : 0.014 s
0.17/0.49	% Maximum resident set size: 3612 pages
0.17/0.49	
0.17/0.49	% -------------------------------------------------
0.17/0.49	% User time                : 0.031 s
0.17/0.49	% System time              : 0.009 s
0.17/0.49	% Total time               : 0.040 s
0.17/0.49	% Maximum resident set size: 4864 pages
0.17/0.49	% E exiting
0.17/0.50	EOF